|
Good
Christians and Easter
Do
good Christians celebrate Easter?
NO!
Origin
and Character of Easter,
a pagan feast
Modern
thought and belief are shaped
to no inconsiderable degree by the faiths and customs of the past. The
influence of old pagan philosophies and superstitions is still felt in
many observances called Christian, observances which are generally
supposed to trace their origin to Bible teaching or apostolic
authority. Particularly is this true of the Easter festival, which,
with much show and ostentation, will soon be
celebrated in many churches throughout the world in honor of Christ.
During
the last few years, much has been made of this service, and its claims
are
being urged anew upon the attention of Christendom. The Scriptures
nowhere enjoin the celebration of Easter, or any other day,
in
commemoration of a feast of the Lord's resurrection. The effort
of
the enemy has been to cloud the pagan origins of this festival and then
to
substitute his own invention through the Roman Church, of the
Easter
observance.
The
reason why he has done this
will appear in considering the origin of the festival. The word Easter
is
from the Anglo-Saxon Esre or Eoster and the German ostern. Ostara was
an
Anglo-Saxon goddess of spring. She was called "goddess of the morning
light,"
or "goddess of the return of the sun." The fourth month of the year,
corresponding to our April, was dedicated to her worship, and was
called Eosturmonath. The
worship of Ostara was derived from that of Baal, Ashtaroth, Ishtar,
Astarte,
Tammuz, etc. These were sun deities, the worship of which extends back
through
all pagan history. The early Britons were sun-worshipers, so that the
veneration
of Ostara in their experience had a very direct relationship to the
worship
of the heavenly bodies. For long ages, antedating the Christian era,
the
pagans celebrated a great annual spring festival in honor of the sun,
under
the name of Tammuz. When the sun returned in the spring of the year,
bringing
new life and causing vegetation to revive, a great feast of rejoicing
was
held. The worshipers decked themselves with evergreen and flowers, and
engaged
in parade and gorgeous display. The worship of Tammuz, as was all
sun-worship,
was the worship of nature, the worship of life or reproduction.
Hence
this worship was attended
with lascivious rites. In consequence the egg came to be used as the
most
fitting symbol of this nature worship. The pagans also believed that
Astarte,
one of the sun deities, was hatched from a large egg which fell down
from
heaven. Preceding the Tammuz festival, the pagans celebrated a fast of
forty
days. This was a time of lamenting and weeping. Surrounded by these
conditions, and receiving into its communion half-pagan converts, the
church of the third
and fourth centuries became leavened with heathen superstitions. There
was
developed a marked spirit to cater to the prejudices and customs of
their
heathen associates, hoping thereby to win the favor of the unconverted,
and
bring them within the fold of the church. Expediency rather than
principle became the controlling motive. A tendency was manifested in
the church to
perpetuate the old passover celebration with special reference to its
Christian
signification in the sacrifice of Christ. This was called the Pascha
service
or festival, and occurred at the same season of year as the heathen
festival.
Seizing upon this spirit of celebration as a pretext to bring about
closer
concord between professed Christians and the heathen, the work of
transformation
was insidiously entered upon. Pagan temples were reconsecrated as
Christian
churches, and little by little the church sought to make its services
conform
to the spirit of heathen celebrations.
In
this way the heathen festival
of Tammuz was taken, and on the pretext of commemorating the
resurrection
of the Lord, it was transplanted to the Christian church. This was a
transformation in name only; the character of the festival was but
little changed. It was
still celebrated with display and ostentation. The flower and evergreen
adornment
was retained, as was also in various ways the employment of the pagan
symbolic
egg. This prayer was used by Pope Paul V, and taught by him to his
adherents:
"Bless, O Lord, we beseech thee, this thy creature of eggs, that it may
become
a wholesome sustenance unto thy servants, eating it in remembrance of
our
Lord Jesus Christ." Nor was the forty-day fast period used by the
heathen
omitted in this work of amalgamating Christianity and paganism. This
was
made the Lenten period preceding the Easter festival, the same as it
was
the period of fasting preceding the festival in honor of the sun
goddess
Tammuz. Of this work of molding the church after pagan models, Hislop,
in
"Two Babylons," speaks as follows:-- To conciliate the pagans to
nominal
Christianity, Rome, pursuing its usual policy, took measures to get the
Christian
and pagan festivals amalgamated, and by a complicated, but skilful
adjustment
of the calendar, it was found no difficult matter in general, to get
paganism
and Christianity, now far sunk in idolatry, in this as in many other
things,
to shake hands. This, in brief, is the history of Easter.
It was a combination
of the old so-called Pascha with the heathen festival in honor of the
sun. The period of lent was
copied wholly from pagan practice. The whole was given a Christian
setting,
but with a retention of old pagan forms and symbols. The reason for
this,
as already suggested, was to win over to the church the favor of the
heathen.
Possibly a worthy motive prompted the effort; but a most questionable
and
costly method, for in thus lowering her standard to heathen ideals, the
church
corrupted her own morals. As to the relationship which Bible Christians
should
sustain to this festival, there can be no question. They must reject it
the
same as they reject other ordinances and observances founded only upon
the
tradition of the church and the carnal commandments of men. The revival
of
the Easter celebration only shows a decline in vital godliness. As the
church
backslides from GOD, and turns a deaf ear to truth, it naturally
reaches
out for something to take the place of its lost power. It again seeks
by
ritualism and imposing services to attract the multitude as the church
of
the past has done. These may satisfy the thoughtless and indifferent,
but
they can never give to the hearts of true worshipers the portion of
spiritual
food for which they seek. GOD's children should conform their beliefs
and
church observances to the purity and simplicity of the Bible standard.
Tradition
and heathen philosophy should make no appeal to Christian duty. The
Scriptures
only can be taken as the basis of faith, the rule of conduct, and the
standard
of morals.
|